Chipotle vs McDonald's: $1,000 invested since 2015

CMG vs MCD · Data through 2026-06-01

$

$1,000 invested in 2015 would be worth

Chipotle

$2,394

+139.4%

McDonald'sWinner

$3,880

+288.0%

The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $4,521(+352.1%)

Growth of $1,000

Chipotle vs. McDonald's vs. S&P 500, 2015 to present

Year-by-year comparison

Chipotle vs. McDonald's, 2015 to present

YearChipotleMcDonald's
2015$1,000$1,000
2016$638$1,385
2017$594$1,414
2018$458$2,025
2019$746$2,169
2020$1,221$2,659
2021$2,085$2,647
2022$2,093$3,380
2023$2,319$3,561
2024$3,393$3,987
2025$4,110$4,027
2026$2,738$4,497

Which came out ahead

Starting in 2015, McDonald's (MCD) was the better of the two against Chipotle (CMG). That $1,000 grew to $3,880 in MCD versus $2,395 in CMG as of 2026-06-01, roughly $1,486 more in the end.

The headline returns line up with the dollar figures. McDonald's returned +288.0% against Chipotle at +139.5%, a gap of about 148.5 percentage points over the 11.6-year window. Compounded, that is about 12.4% a year for MCD against 7.8% for CMG.

Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $4,521, compounding near 13.9% a year. Volatility was not shared evenly. Chipotle moved across a far wider band of yearly returns than McDonald's did. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.

None of this recommends one holding over the other. It is historical math, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Other start years

Chipotle vs McDonald's from a different starting point

Numbers worth sharing

Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.