What if you invested $1,000 in Procter & Gamble in 2010? (Inflation-Adjusted)
PG · Consumer · Adjusted to 2026 dollars using BLS CPI-U data
View nominal (non-adjusted) versionProcter & Gamble turned $1,000 into $3,676 between 2010 and today. Impressive on paper, but inflation over that span came to 53% (BLS CPI-U). Adjusted for that erosion in purchasing power, your real gain in constant 2010 dollars is $2,403, which works out to a +5.5% annualized real growth rate over 17 years.
Nominal final value
$3,676
+267.6% total return
Real value (2010 dollars)
$2,403
+140.3% real total return
Real annualized return
+5.5%
vs. +8.2% nominal annualized
Year-by-Year (Inflation-Adjusted)
$1,000 in Procter & Gamble since 2010, values in constant 2010 dollars
| Year | Nominal Value | Real Value (2010 $) |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
| 2011 | $1,057 | $1,016 |
| 2012 | $1,090 | $1,026 |
| 2013 | $1,343 | $1,238 |
| 2014 | $1,412 | $1,283 |
| 2015 | $1,602 | $1,456 |
| 2016 | $1,604 | $1,436 |
| 2017 | $1,776 | $1,556 |
| 2018 | $1,806 | $1,534 |
| 2019 | $2,089 | $1,734 |
| 2020 | $2,774 | $2,266 |
| 2021 | $2,924 | $2,274 |
| 2022 | $3,752 | $2,673 |
| 2023 | $3,412 | $2,341 |
| 2024 | $3,861 | $2,574 |
| 2025 | $4,180 | $2,732 |
| 2026 | $3,923 | $2,564 |
Inflation adjustment uses BLS CPI-U annual data, deflated to 2026 dollars. Nominal stock data from Yahoo Finance (split-adjusted closing prices). Real values are expressed in constant 2010 purchasing-power dollars. For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. See our methodology and full disclaimer.