What if you invested $1,000 in Procter & Gamble in 2010? (Inflation-Adjusted)
PG · Consumer · Adjusted to 2026 dollars using BLS CPI-U data
View nominal (non-adjusted) versionProcter & Gamble turned $1,000 into $3,883 between 2010 and today. Impressive on paper, but inflation over that span came to 53% (BLS CPI-U). Adjusted for that erosion in purchasing power, your real gain in constant 2010 dollars is $2,538, which works out to a +5.7% annualized real growth rate over 17 years.
Nominal final value
$3,883
+288.3% total return
Real value (2010 dollars)
$2,538
+153.8% real total return
Real annualized return
+5.7%
vs. +8.4% nominal annualized
Year-by-Year (Inflation-Adjusted)
$1,000 in Procter & Gamble since 2010, values in constant 2010 dollars
| Year | Nominal Value | Real Value (2010 $) |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
| 2011 | $1,057 | $1,016 |
| 2012 | $1,091 | $1,027 |
| 2013 | $1,345 | $1,239 |
| 2014 | $1,413 | $1,283 |
| 2015 | $1,602 | $1,456 |
| 2016 | $1,606 | $1,438 |
| 2017 | $1,778 | $1,557 |
| 2018 | $1,806 | $1,535 |
| 2019 | $2,090 | $1,735 |
| 2020 | $2,771 | $2,263 |
| 2021 | $2,921 | $2,272 |
| 2022 | $3,745 | $2,668 |
| 2023 | $3,409 | $2,339 |
| 2024 | $3,858 | $2,572 |
| 2025 | $4,176 | $2,729 |
| 2026 | $3,923 | $2,564 |
Inflation adjustment uses BLS CPI-U annual data, deflated to 2026 dollars. Nominal stock data from Yahoo Finance (split-adjusted closing prices). Real values are expressed in constant 2010 purchasing-power dollars. For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. See our methodology and full disclaimer.