What if you invested in 3M in 2000?
MMM · Industrial · Data through 2026-06-01
If you invested $1,000 in 3M in 2000
The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $8,517(+751.7%)
The S&P 500 returned $8,517 on the same $1,000. 3M beat the market by $2.
Try a different start date
Pick any month and year to see what 3M would be worth.
Compare 3M to another stock
See how 3M stacks up since 2000, head to head.
What if 3M keeps this up?
Project forward at 3M's 8.4% historical growth rate. See 5-30 year scenarios.
Growth of $1,000
3M vs. S&P 500 vs. US Dollar, 2000 to present
Year-by-Year Returns
$1,000 invested in 3M starting January 2000
| Year | Price | Value | Annual |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | $19.01 | $1,000 | - |
| 2001 | $23.03 | $1,212 | +21.2% |
| 2002 | $23.60 | $1,242 | +2.5% |
| 2003 | $27.02 | $1,421 | +14.5% |
| 2004 | $34.98 | $1,841 | +29.5% |
| 2005 | $37.98 | $1,999 | +8.6% |
| 2006 | $33.47 | $1,761 | -11.9% |
| 2007 | $35.01 | $1,842 | +4.6% |
| 2008 | $38.41 | $2,021 | +9.7% |
| 2009 | $26.67 | $1,403 | -30.6% |
| 2010 | $41.26 | $2,171 | +54.7% |
| 2011 | $46.23 | $2,432 | +12% |
| 2012 | $46.78 | $2,461 | +1.2% |
| 2013 | $55.70 | $2,931 | +19.1% |
| 2014 | $72.61 | $3,821 | +30.4% |
| 2015 | $94.17 | $4,955 | +29.7% |
| 2016 | $89.92 | $4,731 | -4.5% |
| 2017 | $106.89 | $5,624 | +18.9% |
| 2018 | $156.76 | $8,248 | +46.7% |
| 2019 | $128.67 | $6,770 | -17.9% |
| 2020 | $105.35 | $5,543 | -18.1% |
| 2021 | $120.99 | $6,366 | +14.8% |
| 2022 | $117.98 | $6,207 | -2.5% |
| 2023 | $85.25 | $4,485 | -27.7% |
| 2024 | $74.11 | $3,900 | -13.1% |
| 2025 | $147.95 | $7,784 | +99.6% |
| 2026 | $151.69 | $7,981 | +2.5% |
What this return means
$1,000 invested in 3M (MMM) in 2000 is worth $8,519 today. That is a +751.9% gain, a little over 8.5x your money, measured to 2026-06-01.
That is about 8.4% a year compounded, broadly in line with long-run stock market averages. The same $1,000 in an S&P 500 index fund over the same span would be about $8,517, so 3M beat the index by roughly $2. The index compounded at about 8.4% a year over that period.
Getting here meant sitting through real volatility. The best single year was 2025 at +99.6%, and the worst was 2009 at -30.6%. At its lowest point the position was down about 53% from an earlier high. These figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, trading fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.
This is historical math, not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
What if you invested $100 a month instead?
Most people do not drop a lump sum in on day one. They add a fixed amount every month. Putting $100 into 3M at the close of every month from January 2000 through June 2026 means 318 buys and $31,800 contributed over about 26.5 years.
$100/month, dollar-cost averaged
$103,979
+227.0% on $31,800 in
Same $31,800, all in at the start
$270,844
+751.7% on $31,800 in
Going all in at the start beat spreading the buys out by $166,864. That is the usual result when a stock trends up: each monthly buy pays a higher price than the last, so the average cost climbs. Averaging in also meant an average buy price of $49.52 per share across the whole stretch, so the monthly buyer never had to time a single low. Neither number counts dividends, taxes, or trading costs.
Illustrative fixed $100/month example, not a recommendation. Figures are computed from MMM split-adjusted monthly closes through June 2026. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
3M at different times
See how the start year changes the outcome
More Industrial investments
Compare returns across the sector
Numbers worth sharing
Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.
For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.