What if you invested in Procter & Gamble in 2000?
PG · Consumer · Data through 2026-06-01
If you invested $1,000 in Procter & Gamble in 2000
The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $8,631(+763.1%)
The S&P 500 returned $8,631 on the same $1,000. S&P 500 outperformed by $3,049.
Try a different start date
Pick any month and year to see what Procter & Gamble would be worth.
Compare Procter & Gamble to another stock
See how Procter & Gamble stacks up since 2000, head to head.
What if Procter & Gamble keeps this up?
Project forward at Procter & Gamble's 6.7% historical growth rate. See 5-30 year scenarios.
Growth of $1,000
Procter & Gamble vs. S&P 500 vs. US Dollar, 2000 to present
Year-by-Year Returns
$1,000 invested in Procter & Gamble starting January 2000
| Year | Price | Value | Annual |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | $25.11 | $1,000 | - |
| 2001 | $18.18 | $724 | -27.6% |
| 2002 | $21.12 | $841 | +16.2% |
| 2003 | $22.72 | $905 | +7.6% |
| 2004 | $27.36 | $1,090 | +20.4% |
| 2005 | $29.36 | $1,169 | +7.3% |
| 2006 | $33.32 | $1,327 | +13.5% |
| 2007 | $37.27 | $1,484 | +11.8% |
| 2008 | $38.38 | $1,528 | +3% |
| 2009 | $32.72 | $1,303 | -14.7% |
| 2010 | $38.13 | $1,518 | +16.5% |
| 2011 | $40.31 | $1,605 | +5.7% |
| 2012 | $41.56 | $1,655 | +3.1% |
| 2013 | $51.22 | $2,040 | +23.2% |
| 2014 | $53.84 | $2,144 | +5.1% |
| 2015 | $61.10 | $2,433 | +13.5% |
| 2016 | $61.15 | $2,435 | +0.1% |
| 2017 | $67.73 | $2,697 | +10.8% |
| 2018 | $68.84 | $2,742 | +1.6% |
| 2019 | $79.63 | $3,171 | +15.7% |
| 2020 | $105.76 | $4,212 | +32.8% |
| 2021 | $111.50 | $4,440 | +5.4% |
| 2022 | $143.04 | $5,696 | +28.3% |
| 2023 | $130.08 | $5,180 | -9.1% |
| 2024 | $147.21 | $5,863 | +13.2% |
| 2025 | $159.38 | $6,347 | +8.3% |
| 2026 | $149.57 | $5,956 | -6.2% |
What this return means
A $1,000 stake in Procter & Gamble (PG) from 2000 has grown to $5,581. That is a +458.1% gain, a little over 5.6x your money, measured to 2026-06-01.
That is only about 6.7% a year once you compound it across 26.5 years. The same $1,000 in an S&P 500 index fund would be about $8,631 over the identical span, so the index came out ahead by roughly $3,049. The index compounded at about 8.5% a year, a reminder that a single stock can lag a basket of them.
The year-by-year record shows how bumpy the ride was. The best single year was 2020 at +32.8%, and the worst was 2001 at -27.6%. At its lowest point the position was down about 28% from an earlier high. These figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, trading fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.
None of this is a recommendation. It is a record of what already happened, and past performance does not guarantee future results.
Procter & Gamble at different times
See how the start year changes the outcome
More Consumer investments
Compare returns across the sector
Related reading
Deep dives and analysis
Numbers worth sharing
Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.
For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.