Which was the better investment since 2000, Coca-Cola or Procter & Gamble?

Coca-Cola was the better investment. $1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2000 would be worth $5,899 today, compared to $5,840 for Procter & Gamble.

What would $1,000 in Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble be worth today?

$1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2000 would be worth $5,899 today (+489.9%). The same $1,000 in Procter & Gamble would be worth $5,840 (+484.0%).

How do Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble compare to the S&P 500 since 2000?

The same $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in 2000 would be worth $8,517 today (+751.7%). Coca-Cola returned $5,899 and Procter & Gamble returned $5,840 over the same period.

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble: $1,000 invested since 2000

KO vs PG · Data through 2026-06-01

Investment amount

$1,000 invested in 2000 would be worth

Coca-ColaWinner

$5,898

+489.8%

Procter & Gamble

$5,840

+484.0%

The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $8,517(+751.7%)

Growth of $1,000

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble vs. S&P 500, 2000 to present

Year-by-year comparison

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble, 2000 to present

Year	Coca-Cola	Return	Procter & Gamble	Return	S&P 500
2000	$1,000	-	$1,000	-	$1,000
2001	$1,023	+2.3%	$724	-27.6%	$992
2002	$789	-22.9%	$841	+16.2%	$830
2003	$742	-6.0%	$905	+7.6%	$641
2004	$921	+24.2%	$1,090	+20.4%	$859
2005	$793	-13.9%	$1,169	+7.3%	$912
2006	$812	+2.3%	$1,327	+13.5%	$1,001
2007	$966	+19.0%	$1,484	+11.8%	$1,150
2008	$1,221	+26.4%	$1,528	+3.0%	$1,119
2009	$910	-25.5%	$1,303	-14.7%	$691
2010	$1,195	+31.4%	$1,518	+16.5%	$916
2011	$1,429	+19.5%	$1,605	+5.7%	$1,120
2012	$1,579	+10.5%	$1,655	+3.1%	$1,167
2013	$1,791	+13.4%	$2,040	+23.2%	$1,359
2014	$1,871	+4.5%	$2,144	+5.1%	$1,651
2015	$2,098	+12.1%	$2,433	+13.5%	$1,884
2016	$2,260	+7.7%	$2,435	+0.1%	$1,868
2017	$2,260	+0.0%	$2,697	+10.8%	$2,241
2018	$2,674	+18.3%	$2,742	+1.6%	$2,830
2019	$2,798	+4.6%	$3,171	+15.7%	$2,761
2020	$3,502	+25.2%	$4,212	+32.8%	$3,353
2021	$2,986	-14.7%	$4,440	+5.4%	$3,929
2022	$3,903	+30.7%	$5,696	+28.3%	$4,841
2023	$4,039	+3.5%	$5,180	-9.1%	$4,444
2024	$4,042	+0.1%	$5,863	+13.2%	$5,360
2025	$4,445	+10.0%	$6,347	+8.3%	$6,766
2026	$5,393	+21.3%	$5,956	-6.2%	$7,871

Which came out ahead

From a $1,000 stake at the start of 2000, Coca-Cola (KO) came out ahead of Procter & Gamble (PG). That $1,000 grew to $5,899 in KO versus $5,840 in PG as of 2026-06-01, roughly $59 more in the end.

In total-return terms the order is clear. Coca-Cola returned +489.9% against Procter & Gamble at +484.0%, a gap of about 5.9 percentage points over the 26.6-year window. Compounded, that is about 6.9% a year for KO against 6.9% for PG.

Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $8,517, compounding near 8.4% a year. Across this long 26.6-year window, small annual differences compounded into the wide ending gap. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.

Treat this as history rather than advice about either company. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Other start years

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble from a different starting point

Since 2005 Since 2010 Since 2015 Since 2020 Since 2023

Individual stock pages

Coca-Cola since 2000+489.9%Procter & Gamble since 2000+484.0%

Compare any two stocks

Pick any two companies, any start date, any amount. See the winner instantly.

Numbers worth sharing

Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.