What if you invested in Starbucks in 2000?
SBUX · Consumer · Data through 2026-06-01
If you invested $1,000 in Starbucks in 2000
The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $8,517(+751.7%)
The S&P 500 returned $8,517 on the same $1,000. Starbucks beat the market by $26,114.
Try a different start date
Pick any month and year to see what Starbucks would be worth.
Compare Starbucks to another stock
See how Starbucks stacks up since 2000, head to head.
What if Starbucks keeps this up?
Project forward at Starbucks's 14.3% historical growth rate. See 5-30 year scenarios.
Growth of $1,000
Starbucks vs. S&P 500 vs. US Dollar, 2000 to present
Year-by-Year Returns
$1,000 invested in Starbucks starting January 2000
| Year | Price | Value | Annual |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | $2.95 | $1,000 | - |
| 2001 | $4.60 | $1,561 | +56.1% |
| 2002 | $4.38 | $1,486 | -4.8% |
| 2003 | $4.19 | $1,420 | -4.4% |
| 2004 | $6.75 | $2,288 | +61.1% |
| 2005 | $9.96 | $3,375 | +47.5% |
| 2006 | $11.69 | $3,963 | +17.4% |
| 2007 | $12.89 | $4,368 | +10.2% |
| 2008 | $6.98 | $2,364 | -45.9% |
| 2009 | $3.48 | $1,180 | -50.1% |
| 2010 | $8.04 | $2,724 | +130.8% |
| 2011 | $11.79 | $3,995 | +46.7% |
| 2012 | $18.19 | $6,164 | +54.3% |
| 2013 | $21.61 | $7,325 | +18.8% |
| 2014 | $27.76 | $9,406 | +28.4% |
| 2015 | $34.67 | $11,750 | +24.9% |
| 2016 | $48.77 | $16,526 | +40.6% |
| 2017 | $44.98 | $15,242 | -7.8% |
| 2018 | $47.13 | $15,972 | +4.8% |
| 2019 | $57.84 | $19,601 | +22.7% |
| 2020 | $73.36 | $24,860 | +26.8% |
| 2021 | $85.45 | $28,957 | +16.5% |
| 2022 | $88.21 | $29,894 | +3.2% |
| 2023 | $100.25 | $33,973 | +13.6% |
| 2024 | $87.24 | $29,566 | -13% |
| 2025 | $103.62 | $35,114 | +18.8% |
| 2026 | $90.83 | $30,781 | -12.3% |
What this return means
$1,000 in Starbucks (SBUX) in 2000 grew to $34,631. That works out to +3363.1%, about 35x the original stake, as of 2026-06-01.
That is about 14.3% a year compounded, broadly in line with long-run stock market averages. A plain S&P 500 fund would have turned that $1,000 into about $8,517 instead, leaving Starbucks ahead by around $26,114. The index compounded at about 8.4% a year over that period.
The path was not smooth. The best single year was 2010 at +130.8%, and the worst was 2009 at -50.1%. At its lowest point the position was down about 73% from an earlier high. These figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, trading fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.
Treat this as history rather than advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
What if you invested $100 a month instead?
Most people do not drop a lump sum in on day one. They add a fixed amount every month. Putting $100 into Starbucks at the close of every month from January 2000 through June 2026 means 318 buys and $31,800 contributed over about 26.5 years.
$100/month, dollar-cost averaged
$278,064
+774.4% on $31,800 in
Same $31,800, all in at the start
$1,101,574
+3,364.1% on $31,800 in
Going all in at the start beat spreading the buys out by $823,509. That is the usual result when a stock trends up: each monthly buy pays a higher price than the last, so the average cost climbs. Averaging in also meant an average buy price of $11.69 per share across the whole stretch, so the monthly buyer never had to time a single low. Neither number counts dividends, taxes, or trading costs.
Illustrative fixed $100/month example, not a recommendation. Figures are computed from SBUX split-adjusted monthly closes through June 2026. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Starbucks at different times
See how the start year changes the outcome
More Consumer investments
Compare returns across the sector
Related reading
Deep dives and analysis
Numbers worth sharing
Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.
For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.