Which was the better investment since 2015, Lululemon or Nike?

Lululemon was the better investment. $1,000 invested in Lululemon in 2015 would be worth $1,479 today, compared to $918 for Nike.

What would $1,000 in Lululemon vs Nike be worth today?

$1,000 invested in Lululemon in 2015 would be worth $1,479 today (+47.9%). The same $1,000 in Nike would be worth $918 (-8.2%).

How do Lululemon and Nike compare to the S&P 500 since 2015?

The same $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in 2015 would be worth $4,630 today (+363%). Lululemon returned $1,479 and Nike returned $918 over the same period.

Lululemon vs Nike: $1,000 invested since 2015

LULU vs NKE · Data through 2026-10-01

Investment amount

$1,000 invested in 2015 would be worth

LululemonWinner

$1,479

+47.9%

Nike

$918

-8.2%

The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $4,630(+363%)

Growth of $1,000

Lululemon vs. Nike vs. S&P 500, 2015 to present

Year-by-year comparison

Lululemon vs. Nike, 2015 to present

Year	Lululemon	Return	Nike	Return	S&P 500
2015	$1,000	-	$1,000	-	$1,000
2016	$937	-6.3%	$1,359	+35.9%	$991
2017	$1,019	+8.8%	$1,173	-13.7%	$1,189
2018	$1,181	+15.8%	$1,533	+30.7%	$1,502
2019	$2,231	+89.0%	$1,860	+21.4%	$1,466
2020	$3,614	+62.0%	$2,211	+18.9%	$1,780
2021	$4,962	+37.3%	$3,097	+40.0%	$2,086
2022	$5,039	+1.5%	$3,458	+11.7%	$2,570
2023	$4,633	-8.1%	$3,006	-13.1%	$2,359
2024	$6,851	+47.9%	$2,428	-19.2%	$2,845
2025	$6,253	-8.7%	$1,870	-23.0%	$3,591
2026	$2,634	-57.9%	$1,539	-17.7%	$4,178

Which came out ahead

From a $1,000 stake at the start of 2015, Lululemon (LULU) came out ahead of Nike (NKE). That $1,000 grew to $1,479 in LULU versus $918 in NKE as of 2026-10-01, roughly $561 more in the end.

The split is the headline here. Lululemon returned +47.9% while Nike returned -8.2%, so the same $1,000 ended up on opposite sides of break-even. Compounded, that is about 3.4% a year for LULU against -0.7% for NKE.

Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $4,630, compounding near 13.8% a year. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.

This is a record of what already happened, not financial advice or a recommendation of either name. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Other start years

Lululemon vs Nike from a different starting point

Since 2010 Since 2020 Since 2023

Individual stock pages

Lululemon since 2015+47.9%Nike since 2015-8.2%

Compare any two stocks

Pick any two companies, any start date, any amount. See the winner instantly.

Numbers worth sharing

Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.