Lululemon vs Nike: $1,000 invested since 2020
LULU vs NKE · Data through 2026-06-01
$1,000 invested in 2020 would be worth
LululemonWinner
$477-52.3%
Nike
$469-53.1%
The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $2,540(+154%)
Growth of $1,000
Lululemon vs. Nike vs. S&P 500, 2020 to present
Year-by-year comparison
Lululemon vs. Nike, 2020 to present
| Year | Lululemon | Nike |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
| 2021 | $1,373 | $1,400 |
| 2022 | $1,394 | $1,564 |
| 2023 | $1,282 | $1,359 |
| 2024 | $1,896 | $1,098 |
| 2025 | $1,730 | $846 |
| 2026 | $729 | $696 |
Which came out ahead
Lululemon (LULU) outpaced Nike (NKE) over this stretch from 2020. That $1,000 grew to $477 in LULU versus $469 in NKE as of 2026-06-01, roughly $8 more in the end.
Neither side rewarded the holder over this window. Lululemon returned -52.3% and Nike returned -53.1%, so both ended below the original $1,000, with Lululemon simply losing less. Compounded, that is about -10.6% a year for LULU against -10.9% for NKE.
Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $2,540, compounding near 15.2% a year. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.
This is a record of what already happened, not financial advice or a recommendation of either name. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Individual stock pages
Numbers worth sharing
Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.
For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.