Which was the better investment since 2010, Lululemon or Nike?

Lululemon was the better investment. $1,000 invested in Lululemon in 2010 would be worth $8,086 today, compared to $3,222 for Nike.

What would $1,000 in Lululemon vs Nike be worth today?

$1,000 invested in Lululemon in 2010 would be worth $8,086 today (+708.6%). The same $1,000 in Nike would be worth $3,222 (+222.2%).

How do Lululemon and Nike compare to the S&P 500 since 2010?

The same $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in 2010 would be worth $9,294 today (+829.4%). Lululemon returned $8,086 and Nike returned $3,222 over the same period.

Lululemon vs Nike: $1,000 invested since 2010

LULU vs NKE · Data through 2026-06-01

Investment amount

$1,000 invested in 2010 would be worth

LululemonWinner

$8,086

+708.6%

Nike

$3,222

+222.2%

The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $9,294(+829.4%)

Growth of $1,000

Lululemon vs. Nike vs. S&P 500, 2010 to present

Year-by-year comparison

Lululemon vs. Nike, 2010 to present

Year	Lululemon	Return	Nike	Return	S&P 500
2010	$1,000	-	$1,000	-	$1,000
2011	$2,432	+143.2%	$1,313	+31.3%	$1,222
2012	$4,471	+83.8%	$1,680	+27.9%	$1,273
2013	$4,887	+9.3%	$1,772	+5.5%	$1,483
2014	$3,236	-33.8%	$2,422	+36.6%	$1,801
2015	$4,691	+45.0%	$3,104	+28.2%	$2,056
2016	$4,396	-6.3%	$4,217	+35.9%	$2,038
2017	$4,781	+8.8%	$3,641	-13.7%	$2,445
2018	$5,539	+15.8%	$4,758	+30.7%	$3,088
2019	$10,468	+89.0%	$5,775	+21.4%	$3,013
2020	$16,954	+62.0%	$6,864	+18.9%	$3,659
2021	$23,278	+37.3%	$9,613	+40.0%	$4,288
2022	$23,637	+1.5%	$10,735	+11.7%	$5,282
2023	$21,734	-8.1%	$9,330	-13.1%	$4,850
2024	$32,140	+47.9%	$7,536	-19.2%	$5,849
2025	$29,334	-8.7%	$5,806	-23.0%	$7,383
2026	$12,358	-57.9%	$4,776	-17.7%	$8,588

Which came out ahead

Starting in 2010, Lululemon (LULU) was the better of the two against Nike (NKE). That $1,000 grew to $8,086 in LULU versus $3,222 in NKE as of 2026-06-01, roughly $4,865 more in the end.

In total-return terms the order is clear. Lululemon returned +708.6% against Nike at +222.2%, a gap of about 486.4 percentage points over the 16.6-year window. Compounded, that is about 13.4% a year for LULU against 7.3% for NKE.

Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $9,294, compounding near 14.4% a year. The two paths differed in how rough they were. Lululemon moved across a far wider band of yearly returns than Nike did. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.

Treat this as history rather than advice about either company. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Other start years

Lululemon vs Nike from a different starting point

Since 2015 Since 2020 Since 2023

Individual stock pages

Lululemon since 2010+708.6%Nike since 2010+222.2%

Compare any two stocks

Pick any two companies, any start date, any amount. See the winner instantly.

Numbers worth sharing

Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.