Which was the better investment since 2005, Coca-Cola or Procter & Gamble?

Coca-Cola was the better investment. $1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2005 would be worth $7,437 today, compared to $4,994 for Procter & Gamble.

What would $1,000 in Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble be worth today?

$1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2005 would be worth $7,437 today (+643.7%). The same $1,000 in Procter & Gamble would be worth $4,994 (+399.4%).

How do Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble compare to the S&P 500 since 2005?

The same $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in 2005 would be worth $9,342 today (+834.2%). Coca-Cola returned $7,437 and Procter & Gamble returned $4,994 over the same period.

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble: $1,000 invested since 2005

KO vs PG · Data through 2026-06-01

Investment amount

$1,000 invested in 2005 would be worth

Coca-ColaWinner

$7,436

+643.6%

Procter & Gamble

$4,995

+399.5%

The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $9,342(+834.2%)

Growth of $1,000

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble vs. S&P 500, 2005 to present

Year-by-year comparison

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble, 2005 to present

Year	Coca-Cola	Return	Procter & Gamble	Return	S&P 500
2005	$1,000	-	$1,000	-	$1,000
2006	$1,023	+2.3%	$1,135	+13.5%	$1,098
2007	$1,218	+19.0%	$1,269	+11.8%	$1,261
2008	$1,539	+26.4%	$1,307	+3.0%	$1,227
2009	$1,147	-25.5%	$1,115	-14.7%	$758
2010	$1,507	+31.4%	$1,299	+16.5%	$1,005
2011	$1,801	+19.5%	$1,373	+5.7%	$1,228
2012	$1,991	+10.5%	$1,415	+3.1%	$1,280
2013	$2,258	+13.4%	$1,744	+23.2%	$1,491
2014	$2,359	+4.5%	$1,834	+5.1%	$1,811
2015	$2,644	+12.1%	$2,081	+13.5%	$2,066
2016	$2,849	+7.7%	$2,083	+0.1%	$2,048
2017	$2,849	+0.0%	$2,307	+10.8%	$2,458
2018	$3,371	+18.3%	$2,345	+1.6%	$3,104
2019	$3,527	+4.6%	$2,712	+15.7%	$3,029
2020	$4,415	+25.2%	$3,602	+32.8%	$3,678
2021	$3,765	-14.7%	$3,798	+5.4%	$4,310
2022	$4,921	+30.7%	$4,872	+28.3%	$5,309
2023	$5,092	+3.5%	$4,431	-9.1%	$4,875
2024	$5,096	+0.1%	$5,014	+13.2%	$5,879
2025	$5,604	+10.0%	$5,428	+8.3%	$7,421
2026	$6,799	+21.3%	$5,094	-6.2%	$8,633

Which came out ahead

Starting in 2005, Coca-Cola (KO) was the better of the two against Procter & Gamble (PG). That $1,000 grew to $7,437 in KO versus $4,994 in PG as of 2026-06-01, roughly $2,442 more in the end.

Stacked side by side, the totals tell the same story. Coca-Cola returned +643.7% against Procter & Gamble at +399.4%, a gap of about 244.3 percentage points over the 21.6-year window. Compounded, that is about 9.7% a year for KO against 7.7% for PG.

Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $9,342, compounding near 10.9% a year. Across this long 21.6-year window, small annual differences compounded into the wide ending gap. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.

None of this recommends one holding over the other. It is historical math, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Other start years

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble from a different starting point

Since 2000 Since 2010 Since 2015 Since 2020 Since 2023

Individual stock pages

Coca-Cola since 2005+643.7%Procter & Gamble since 2005+399.4%

Compare any two stocks

Pick any two companies, any start date, any amount. See the winner instantly.

Numbers worth sharing

Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.