Which was the better investment since 2015, Coca-Cola or Procter & Gamble?

Coca-Cola was the better investment. $1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2015 would be worth $2,812 today, compared to $2,400 for Procter & Gamble.

What would $1,000 in Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble be worth today?

$1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2015 would be worth $2,812 today (+181.2%). The same $1,000 in Procter & Gamble would be worth $2,400 (+140.0%).

How do Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble compare to the S&P 500 since 2015?

The same $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in 2015 would be worth $4,521 today (+352.1%). Coca-Cola returned $2,812 and Procter & Gamble returned $2,400 over the same period.

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble: $1,000 invested since 2015

KO vs PG · Data through 2026-06-01

Investment amount

$1,000 invested in 2015 would be worth

Coca-ColaWinner

$2,813

+181.3%

Procter & Gamble

$2,400

+140.0%

The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $4,521(+352.1%)

Growth of $1,000

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble vs. S&P 500, 2015 to present

Year-by-year comparison

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble, 2015 to present

Year	Coca-Cola	Return	Procter & Gamble	Return	S&P 500
2015	$1,000	-	$1,000	-	$1,000
2016	$1,077	+7.7%	$1,001	+0.1%	$991
2017	$1,077	+0.0%	$1,109	+10.8%	$1,189
2018	$1,275	+18.3%	$1,127	+1.6%	$1,502
2019	$1,334	+4.6%	$1,303	+15.7%	$1,466
2020	$1,670	+25.2%	$1,731	+32.8%	$1,780
2021	$1,424	-14.7%	$1,825	+5.4%	$2,086
2022	$1,861	+30.7%	$2,341	+28.3%	$2,570
2023	$1,926	+3.5%	$2,129	-9.1%	$2,359
2024	$1,927	+0.1%	$2,409	+13.2%	$2,845
2025	$2,119	+10.0%	$2,609	+8.3%	$3,591
2026	$2,571	+21.3%	$2,448	-6.2%	$4,178

Which came out ahead

Coca-Cola (KO) outpaced Procter & Gamble (PG) over this stretch from 2015. That $1,000 grew to $2,812 in KO versus $2,400 in PG as of 2026-06-01, roughly $412 more in the end.

Stacked side by side, the totals tell the same story. Coca-Cola returned +181.2% against Procter & Gamble at +140.0%, a gap of about 41.2 percentage points over the 11.6-year window. Compounded, that is about 9.3% a year for KO against 7.9% for PG.

Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $4,521, compounding near 13.9% a year. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.

None of this recommends one holding over the other. It is historical math, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Other start years

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble from a different starting point

Since 2000 Since 2005 Since 2010 Since 2020 Since 2023

Individual stock pages

Coca-Cola since 2015+181.2%Procter & Gamble since 2015+140.0%

Compare any two stocks

Pick any two companies, any start date, any amount. See the winner instantly.

Numbers worth sharing

Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.