Which was the better investment since 2010, Coca-Cola or Procter & Gamble?

Coca-Cola was the better investment. $1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2010 would be worth $4,935 today, compared to $3,846 for Procter & Gamble.

What would $1,000 in Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble be worth today?

$1,000 invested in Coca-Cola in 2010 would be worth $4,935 today (+393.5%). The same $1,000 in Procter & Gamble would be worth $3,846 (+284.6%).

How do Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble compare to the S&P 500 since 2010?

The same $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in 2010 would be worth $9,294 today (+829.4%). Coca-Cola returned $4,935 and Procter & Gamble returned $3,846 over the same period.

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble: $1,000 invested since 2010

KO vs PG · Data through 2026-06-01

Investment amount

$1,000 invested in 2010 would be worth

Coca-ColaWinner

$4,936

+393.6%

Procter & Gamble

$3,846

+284.6%

The same $1,000 in the S&P 500 would be worth $9,294(+829.4%)

Growth of $1,000

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble vs. S&P 500, 2010 to present

Year-by-year comparison

Coca-Cola vs. Procter & Gamble, 2010 to present

Year	Coca-Cola	Return	Procter & Gamble	Return	S&P 500
2010	$1,000	-	$1,000	-	$1,000
2011	$1,195	+19.5%	$1,057	+5.7%	$1,222
2012	$1,321	+10.5%	$1,090	+3.1%	$1,273
2013	$1,498	+13.4%	$1,343	+23.2%	$1,483
2014	$1,565	+4.5%	$1,412	+5.1%	$1,801
2015	$1,755	+12.1%	$1,602	+13.5%	$2,056
2016	$1,890	+7.7%	$1,604	+0.1%	$2,038
2017	$1,890	+0.0%	$1,776	+10.8%	$2,445
2018	$2,237	+18.3%	$1,806	+1.6%	$3,088
2019	$2,340	+4.6%	$2,089	+15.7%	$3,013
2020	$2,930	+25.2%	$2,774	+32.8%	$3,659
2021	$2,498	-14.7%	$2,924	+5.4%	$4,288
2022	$3,265	+30.7%	$3,752	+28.3%	$5,282
2023	$3,379	+3.5%	$3,412	-9.1%	$4,850
2024	$3,381	+0.1%	$3,861	+13.2%	$5,849
2025	$3,718	+10.0%	$4,180	+8.3%	$7,383
2026	$4,511	+21.3%	$3,923	-6.2%	$8,588

Which came out ahead

From a $1,000 stake at the start of 2010, Coca-Cola (KO) came out ahead of Procter & Gamble (PG). That $1,000 grew to $4,935 in KO versus $3,846 in PG as of 2026-06-01, roughly $1,089 more in the end.

Stacked side by side, the totals tell the same story. Coca-Cola returned +393.5% against Procter & Gamble at +284.6%, a gap of about 108.9 percentage points over the 16.6-year window. Compounded, that is about 10.1% a year for KO against 8.5% for PG.

Neither holding beat a plain S&P 500 fund over the same span. The index would have grown that $1,000 to about $9,294, compounding near 14.4% a year. All figures use split-adjusted closing prices and exclude dividends, taxes, fees, and inflation, so a real after-tax result would differ.

This is a record of what already happened, not financial advice or a recommendation of either name. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Other start years

Coca-Cola vs Procter & Gamble from a different starting point

Since 2000 Since 2005 Since 2015 Since 2020 Since 2023

Individual stock pages

Coca-Cola since 2010+393.5%Procter & Gamble since 2010+284.6%

Compare any two stocks

Pick any two companies, any start date, any amount. See the winner instantly.

Numbers worth sharing

Occasional data drops when something interesting surfaces. No schedule, just signal.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All calculations are based on split-adjusted closing prices from Yahoo Finance and do not account for dividends, taxes, or trading fees. See our methodology and full disclaimer.